03.11.2026 | Reading time: 3 minutes

Series: "Digital Sovereignty in Practice" Part 1 of 3

"No, I cannot guarantee that." Why Digital Sovereignty Belongs on the Agenda Now, and How to Navigate the Maze of Frameworks

C5, C3A, EU CSF, SEAL, SecNumCloud, EUCS, CADA, IRN: In a short space of time, more acronyms have emerged around digital sovereignty than even specialists can immediately categorise. In this three-part series, we provide an overview. Part 1 demonstrates why the topic is pressing right now, why sovereignty cannot be the goal at all costs, and which four questions help clear a path through the jungle.

A Statement Under Oath

On 10 June 2025, Anton Carniaux, Director of Public Affairs and Legal at Microsoft France, testified under oath before an inquiry committee of the French Senate examining public procurement. The rapporteur wanted to know whether Microsoft could guarantee that data belonging to French citizens would never be disclosed upon order of the US government without France's explicit consent.

The answer was unambiguous:

„Non, je ne peux pas le garantir.“

No, I cannot guarantee that.1
Anton Carniaux, Microsoft France, before the French Senate on 10 June 2025

He added that such a case had not yet occurred. The statement remains remarkable nonetheless, as it openly describes the applicable legal position: since the US CLOUD Act of 2018, American providers must disclose data upon official request, “regardless of whether it is located within or outside the United States”2. A data centre in Frankfurt does little to change this, as long as the parent company remains subject to US law.

A second example from spring 2025 concerns the International Criminal Court in The Hague. Its Chief Prosecutor, Karim Khan, was placed on a US sanctions list in February 2025.3 In May, the news agency AP reported that his Microsoft mailbox had been deactivated and that he had had to switch to Proton Mail. Microsoft clarified that it had never suspended services for the Court as a whole, but had merely disconnected the sanctioned official.4

Regardless of the details, both cases demonstrate that the decisive question has shifted. Previously, it was: Where is my data stored? Today, it is: Who can flip the switch?

The case had a sequel: in October 2025, Handelsblatt5 reported that the Criminal Court was transitioning its office software to openDesk, an open-source suite backed by the Centre for Digital Sovereignty of the German Federal Government (Zentrum für Digitale Souveränität des Bundes). An international court that had just experienced dependence on a US corporation in very concrete terms was thus turning, of all things, to a solution from the German public administration.

Important, But Not at All Costs

The obvious reaction would be to bring everything back in-house. That falls short. Microsoft 365, the clouds of AWS, Microsoft and Google, AI assistants such as ChatGPT or Copilot: without these technologies, hardly any business remains competitive. Yet with them arise dependencies that must be actively managed.

 

The Dilemma of Modern Technologies

Figure 1: The dilemma – essential technologies that create dependencies.

Modern technologies are indispensable for competitiveness, but create dependencies that can become critical.

Digital sovereignty therefore does not mean renouncing everything that does not come from Europe. What is meant is the ability to make technological decisions autonomously and to manage critical dependencies: regarding data, operations, and the technology itself. Each of these dimensions comes at a price: greater sovereignty usually costs money, increases complexity, and often reduces innovative power.

Figure 2: Digital sovereignty – three dimensions and the trade-off between costs, complexity and innovation.

The goal is therefore not maximum sovereignty, but the right balance between independence and technical excellence, and this may differ for every use case.

To determine this balance, numerous frameworks have emerged in a short space of time: EU CSF, C3A, CADA, and IRN, alongside established standards such as C5 in Germany and SecNumCloud in France, as well as the EU certificate EUCS, which has been under negotiation for years. Anyone looking to engage with the topic now faces an alphabet soup in which every acronym promises to make sovereignty tangible. That is precisely where the first misunderstanding begins.

Each Framework Answers a Different Question

The maze clears as soon as one stops asking which framework is the right one, and instead asks which question it answers. In essence, there are only four:

  1. Security: Is the cloud service secure?
  2. Sovereignty: How independent is the service from states outside the EU?
  3. Obligation: Which provider is permitted for which task?
  4. Resilience: How effectively does my own organisation master its critical dependencies?

The first three questions focus on the provider. The fourth focuses on your own organisation. This task is not new: managing dependencies on vendors and service providers is a classic discipline of IT, supplemented in regulated institutions by risk management and compliance as a second line of defence. What is new is the benchmark: geopolitical risks are now explicitly included, and the time available to respond to them has become shorter.

Figure 3: Sovereignty frameworks, ordered by the question they answer.

What Comes Next

As part of our three-part blog post series, we examine the four questions step by step. In Part 2, we turn our attention to providers of sovereign products and examine how C5 and the stalled EUCS govern security, how EU CSF, C3A and SecNumCloud make sovereignty measurable, and why the Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA) could soon turn this voluntary exercise into a mandatory requirement. Part 3 focuses on your organisation's resilience and what the Indice de Résilience Numérique (IRN) means for you in practical terms.

Initial Consultation on digital Sovereignty Strategy

Intero Consulting supports you in developing and implementing your tailored digital sovereignty strategy. With our experience in IT governance, digitalisation and procurement, we guide you from the initial analysis and preliminary study through to implementation.

Contact us for a non-binding initial consultation regarding your individual challenges in the field of digital sovereignty.

Your Sovereignty Expert

Dies ist ein Portrait von Nadine Goeppel.

Nadine Göppel

Partner

Nathan Lorenzen

Junior Consultant

Sources:

 

  1. Senate, Minutes of the Committee of Inquiry on Public Procurement, June 10, 2025 – https://www.senat.fr/compte-rendu-commissions/20250609/ce_commande_publique.html 
  2. U.S. Congress, CLOUD Act (H.R. 4943) – https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4943 
  3. AP/PBS: Trump’s sanctions on the ICC’s chief prosecutor have halted the tribunal’s work, May 15, 2025 – https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/trumps-sanctions-on-iccs-chief-prosecutor-have-halted-tribunals-work-officials-and-lawyers-say 
  4. Microsoft Denmark: Statement regarding the ICC, May 28, 2025 – https://news.microsoft.com/da-dk/2025/05/28/kommentar-fra-microsoft-vedr-icc/ 
  5. netzpolitik.org: International Criminal Court Removes Microsoft from Its Administration, October 2025 – https://netzpolitik.org/2025/sorge-vor-us-sanktionen-internationaler-strafgerichtshof-kickt-microsoft-aus-seiner-verwaltung/ 

Further Impulses on IT Controlling

03.11.2026 | Reading time: 3 minutes

Digital Sovereignty: Cloud Frameworks Assessed

Dies ist ein blau eingefärbtes Bild von Architektur.
27.10.2026 | Reading time: 4 minutes

AI sovereignty: What German companies need to know now

May 12th 2026

AIOps as an Enabler for IT Operations in the Financial Sector

27.04.2026

Strategically Replacing Core Applications: Your Guide to Successful Migration

18.03.2026

SAMS DACH 2026: R+V wins Award with Intero Consulting

03.03.2026

Cloud Sovereignty: European Alternatives to US Hyperscalers

Focus Topic

SAM Optimisation: Save Up to 30% on Software Costs

Focus Topic

Digital Sovereignty: Why European Enterprises Must Act Now

Dies ist ein blau eingefärbtes Bild von Architektur.
IT-Steuerung

IT Outsourcing Consultancy: From Strategy to Successful Implementation

21.02.2025

Overcoming Vendor Lock-In: 3 Success Factors for Migrating Business-Critical IT Systems

16.12.2024

Contract revision in IT companies

Header mit Schachbrett für einen Impuls über strategisches und operatives Providermanagement
05.11.2024

Strategic and operational provider management

22.12.2023

Successful implementation of IT outsourcing

04.12.2023

Best of Consulting Mittelstand Award 2023

17.08.2023

Cloud Native Conference 2023

05.07.2023

Best of Consulting Mittelstand 2023

05.07.2023

Challenges in telecommunications and IT

23.05.2023

Price increases for software

27.03.2023

Inflation in the IT sector

30.11.2022

Best of Consulting Mittelstand 2022 - We have been awarded!

13.09.2022

RPA & Process Mining

27.06.2022

Order2Cash

28.04.2022

SAMS 2022

17.01.2022

WEB SUMMIT 2021

24.11.2022

Best of Consulting Mittelstand 2021 - We have been awarded!

12.10.2021

Whitepaper Cloud journey: Roadmap to the cloud

05.10.2021

Cloud Computing Whitepaper

29.09.2021

Whitepaper Cloud Implementation and Migration

11.08.2021

Outsourcing Contract Agreement (OCA-Score)

Our Competence Center IT Controlling