He added that such a case had not yet occurred. The statement remains remarkable nonetheless, as it openly describes the applicable legal position: since the US CLOUD Act of 2018, American providers must disclose data upon official request, “regardless of whether it is located within or outside the United States”2. A data centre in Frankfurt does little to change this, as long as the parent company remains subject to US law.
A second example from spring 2025 concerns the International Criminal Court in The Hague. Its Chief Prosecutor, Karim Khan, was placed on a US sanctions list in February 2025.3 In May, the news agency AP reported that his Microsoft mailbox had been deactivated and that he had had to switch to Proton Mail. Microsoft clarified that it had never suspended services for the Court as a whole, but had merely disconnected the sanctioned official.4
Regardless of the details, both cases demonstrate that the decisive question has shifted. Previously, it was: Where is my data stored? Today, it is: Who can flip the switch?
The case had a sequel: in October 2025, Handelsblatt5 reported that the Criminal Court was transitioning its office software to openDesk, an open-source suite backed by the Centre for Digital Sovereignty of the German Federal Government (Zentrum für Digitale Souveränität des Bundes). An international court that had just experienced dependence on a US corporation in very concrete terms was thus turning, of all things, to a solution from the German public administration.